How Tax Proposals and the Election Impact Investors

It’s important to maintain perspective this election season

Tax policy is an extremely complex subject that impacts everyone differently, so it’s always important to work with a trusted financial advisor. In addition, both candidates’ platforms are still subject to change despite the short timeline until election day. While it’s impossible to cover all the details here, many of the key differences on taxes between the candidates and their parties come down to the future of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that was passed in 2017.

Before discussing the details, it’s important to maintain perspective around tax policy since these issues can be politically heated. Taxes are intertwined with politics and reflect our currently polarized political climate. Regardless of which side of the aisle we might be on and what our personal preferences may be, it is important to stay objective so we can clearly focus on our specific financial situations and goals.

While taxes have a direct impact on households and companies, they do not always have a straightforward effect on the overall economy and stock market. This is because taxes are only one of the factors that influence growth and returns. There are many deductions, credits, and strategies that can reduce the statutory tax rate, and spending and investment patterns often adjust to work around taxes. In other words, lower taxes do not automatically result in an economic boom and higher tax rates do not necessarily result in a crash.

Additionally, election rhetoric and the actual policies that come to fruition can be quite different. Candidates often make promises based on their political leanings that may not fully materialize once in office. Even once a candidate is elected, Congressional partnership and approval is still required to pass new tax laws. Historically, the president’s party tends to lose seats in Congress in their second term, and their approval rating tends to decline. This process can alter or water down initial proposals.

For example, during the 2016 presidential campaign, President Trump promised a complete overhaul of the tax system. While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was a significant change to the tax code, it also retained many existing elements. Similarly, President Biden criticized the TCJA during the 2020 election cycle and discussed raising taxes on high income earners and corporations. While the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 did impose a 15% minimum corporate tax rate, this is far from the sweeping changes discussed during the election.

The future of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and national debt is uncertain

The truth is that tax rates have been quite low by historical standards for decades. Even if there are no changes in the next presidential term, with the federal debt continuing to expand, many economists worry about how best to close the gap in the future.

The TCJA took effect in 2018 and included reducing individual income tax rates with the highest rate declining from 39.6% to 37%, nearly doubling the standard deduction, dropping the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, and implementing a territorial tax system for corporations. The TCJA also lowered estate taxes, eliminated personal exemptions, and adjusted several other deductions and credits.

As discussed above, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 introduced a 15% minimum tax on large corporations with annual profits over $1 billion. It also implemented a 1% excise tax on stock buybacks for publicly traded companies.

Unless action is taken by the president and Congress, many provisions of the TCJA will expire for the 2026 tax season, creating a so-called “tax cliff.” This makes taxes especially contentious this election season. Here are some of the items the candidates are discussing:

• Trump proposes cutting corporate taxes further from 21% to 15% for some companies, including manufacturers who make their products domestically. Harris is in favor of increasing the corporate tax rate to 28%, in line with President Biden’s position.
• Trump has discussed extending the TCJA’s individual tax rates, but specifics are still unclear. Harris supports allowing the top marginal rate to revert to 39.6%.
• Harris proposes raising the capital gains rate from 20% to 28%. Along with an increase in the “net investment income tax” introduced with the Affordable Care Act, the top capital gains rate would rise to 33%, the highest since 1978.
• Both candidates propose new enhanced child tax credits and not taxing tips. Trump has discussed eliminating taxes on Social Security for seniors.
• Harris proposes expanding the startup expense deduction from $5,000 to $50,000 and $25,000 in support of first-time homebuyers making down payments.
• Harris proposes a new tax on unrealized capital gains for those worth $100 million or more. Such a tax would be historic. The recent Moore v. United States case in the Supreme Court loosely touched on this by allowing a provision in the TCJA that imposed a one-time tax on unrepatriated foreign earnings.

The economy has grown under both parties

Unfortunately, the annual budget deficit remains high and the national debt is likely to grow, potentially in the trillions, regardless of who occupies the White House. However, it’s also the case that the economy has grown over history under both political parties, as illustrated in the accompanying chart above. As discussed earlier, it is important to remember that who occupies the White House is not necessarily the most important factor for the economy and markets, regardless of how counterintuitive that may seem. Policy changes tend to be gradual due to checks and balances in our political system. Perhaps more importantly, neither candidate is proposing a return to pre-Reagan era tax levels when the top marginal rates reached as high as 94%.

The bottom line? As the election season heats up, it is important to maintain perspective amid heightened political rhetoric and divergent tax/economic proposals from the candidates. While taxes do play an important role in financial plans and investment portfolios, they are one factor to consider among many. By maintaining a balanced perspective, focusing on your personal situation and goals, and avoiding politically driven decisions, investors can better position themselves for success across the evolving political landscape.